<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pagetable.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=48" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48</link>
	<description>Some Assembly Required</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:11:32 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blackjack Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-102079</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackjack Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-102079</guid>
		<description>I think the Versions of GW BASIC for Windows and Linux would be great to,
The old languages are makes them quicker to learn, Anyone using more static languages, such as C and C++, will be used to attaching debuggers  to running programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Versions of GW BASIC for Windows and Linux would be great to,<br />
The old languages are makes them quicker to learn, Anyone using more static languages, such as C and C++, will be used to attaching debuggers  to running programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Boyanich</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-101052</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Boyanich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-101052</guid>
		<description>This is so hot. My SGI Irix machine now is able to run legacy CBM BASIC much faster than in VICE. Now, how do I peek and poke the CRiMe graphics on my O2 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so hot. My SGI Irix machine now is able to run legacy CBM BASIC much faster than in VICE. Now, how do I peek and poke the CRiMe graphics on my O2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiaM</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-100997</link>
		<dc:creator>MiaM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-100997</guid>
		<description>Ric:

Isn&#039;t it possible to run GWBASIC.EXE directly under Windows? (at least on 32-bit windows)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ric:</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it possible to run GWBASIC.EXE directly under Windows? (at least on 32-bit windows)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-100982</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-100982</guid>
		<description>Versions of GWBASIC for Windows and Linux would be great too. I havnt got a clue how to do that myself. I love the simplicity of the old languages - makes them quicker to learn and use for the occassional programmer. A dBase language would be another contender for this treatment, since I&#039;ve been searching for something I can use to create simple databases without success.  Thanks very much for making this available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Versions of GWBASIC for Windows and Linux would be great too. I havnt got a clue how to do that myself. I love the simplicity of the old languages &#8211; makes them quicker to learn and use for the occassional programmer. A dBase language would be another contender for this treatment, since I&#8217;ve been searching for something I can use to create simple databases without success.  Thanks very much for making this available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lund</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-100835</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-100835</guid>
		<description>You mean the 68000.  And probably also the 6800 series, also from Motorola.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean the 68000.  And probably also the 6800 series, also from Motorola.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-100819</link>
		<dc:creator>David M Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-100819</guid>
		<description>The 6510 processor was NOT by Motorola! You&#039;re thinking of the 65000 which was used in Macintoshes and the Amiga.

The 6510 was from MOS semiconductor, who Commodore bought and owned. Ironically, the Apple II and the Atari 2600 used the 6502 processor and had to buy them from Commodore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 6510 processor was NOT by Motorola! You&#8217;re thinking of the 65000 which was used in Macintoshes and the Amiga.</p>
<p>The 6510 was from MOS semiconductor, who Commodore bought and owned. Ironically, the Apple II and the Atari 2600 used the 6502 processor and had to buy them from Commodore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#1057;&#1090;&#1088;&#1086;&#1080;&#1090;&#1077;&#1083;&#1100;&#1085;&#1086;&#1077; &#1087;&#1088;&#1086;&#1080;&#1079;&#1074;&#1086;&#1076;&#1089;&#1090;&#1074;&#1086;</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-100792</link>
		<dc:creator>&#1057;&#1090;&#1088;&#1086;&#1080;&#1090;&#1077;&#1083;&#1100;&#1085;&#1086;&#1077; &#1087;&#1088;&#1086;&#1080;&#1079;&#1074;&#1086;&#1076;&#1089;&#1090;&#1074;&#1086;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-100792</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&#1056;&#1080;&#1089;. 6.7. &#1055;&#1088;&#1080;&#1089;&#1087;&#1086;&#1089;&#1086;&#1073;&#1083;&#1077;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103;...&lt;/strong&gt;

183182&#1056;&#1080;&#1089;. 6.7. &#1055;&#1088;&#1080;&#1089;&#1087;&#1086;&#1089;&#1086;&#1073;&#1083;&#1077;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103; &#1076;&#1083;&#1103; &#1086;&#1087;&#1088;&#1077;&#1076;&#1077;&#1083;&#1077;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103; &#1074;&#1077;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#1056;&#1080;&#1089;. 6.7. &#1055;&#1088;&#1080;&#1089;&#1087;&#1086;&#1089;&#1086;&#1073;&#1083;&#1077;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>183<br />
182<br />
&#1056;&#1080;&#1089;. 6.7. &#1055;&#1088;&#1080;&#1089;&#1087;&#1086;&#1089;&#1086;&#1073;&#1083;&#1077;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103; &#1076;&#1083;&#1103; &#1086;&#1087;&#1088;&#1077;&#1076;&#1077;&#1083;&#1077;&#1085;&#1080;&#1103; &#1074;&#1077;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StooBlog v0.1</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-100481</link>
		<dc:creator>StooBlog v0.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-100481</guid>
		<description>[...] I like blogs, however the blogs I like are those I can find on Google through a search engine in answer to a specific problem, or are linked too from a specific community and are therefore interesting because of that.I&#8217;d like this to be one of those blogs.Hi! My name is Stuart Monteith. I created this blog because of my involvement in the Apache Kato incubator project.This project aims to develop JSR-326, a Java standard for an API that allows tools to debug Java programs, possibly JVMs.Why should you care?Ultimately, the aim is to solve programs with Java programs in a different way that you might be used to.  Anyone using more static languages, such as C and C++, will be used to attaching debuggers (such as windbg, dbx, gdb) to running programs. Fine, but they could also attach to programs that had crashed, or generated a core file for some other reason. You can&#8217;t do that in Java.That is a lie. You can&#8217;t do that on every JVM from every vendor and write tools to do it. I&#8217;ll explain more tomorrow&#8230;And finally, a link to a most excellent, non-Java blog: http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I like blogs, however the blogs I like are those I can find on Google through a search engine in answer to a specific problem, or are linked too from a specific community and are therefore interesting because of that.I&#8217;d like this to be one of those blogs.Hi! My name is Stuart Monteith. I created this blog because of my involvement in the Apache Kato incubator project.This project aims to develop JSR-326, a Java standard for an API that allows tools to debug Java programs, possibly JVMs.Why should you care?Ultimately, the aim is to solve programs with Java programs in a different way that you might be used to.  Anyone using more static languages, such as C and C++, will be used to attaching debuggers (such as windbg, dbx, gdb) to running programs. Fine, but they could also attach to programs that had crashed, or generated a core file for some other reason. You can&#8217;t do that in Java.That is a lie. You can&#8217;t do that on every JVM from every vendor and write tools to do it. I&#8217;ll explain more tomorrow&#8230;And finally, a link to a most excellent, non-Java blog: http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MagerValp</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-99984</link>
		<dc:creator>MagerValp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-99984</guid>
		<description>Either way the 6510 is 100% compatible with the 6502, as it uses the same CPU die. The only difference is the added 6-bit I/O register and tristate logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way the 6510 is 100% compatible with the 6502, as it uses the same CPU die. The only difference is the added 6-bit I/O register and tristate logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Woodard</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-99981</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Woodard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-99981</guid>
		<description>OK, I am thinking assembler...my bad :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I am thinking assembler&#8230;my bad :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Woodard</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-99980</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Woodard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-99980</guid>
		<description>You are aware that the Commodore 64 used the Motorola 6510 processor, correct? It was the Vic-20 that used the 6502. Can you be sure that this is 100% compatible with the Commodore 64&#039;s version of basic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are aware that the Commodore 64 used the Motorola 6510 processor, correct? It was the Vic-20 that used the 6502. Can you be sure that this is 100% compatible with the Commodore 64&#8217;s version of basic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-99927</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-99927</guid>
		<description>Turn CAPS LOCK on to aviod syntax errors.
C64 manuals can be found here:

http://www.lemon64.com/manual/

http://www.devili.iki.fi/Computers/Commodore/C64/Programmers_Reference/page_iii.html

-Allan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turn CAPS LOCK on to aviod syntax errors.<br />
C64 manuals can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lemon64.com/manual/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lemon64.com/manual/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.devili.iki.fi/Computers/Commodore/C64/Programmers_Reference/page_iii.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.devili.iki.fi/Computers/Commodore/C64/Programmers_Reference/page_iii.html</a></p>
<p>-Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarryG</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-99759</link>
		<dc:creator>LarryG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-99759</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m able to run cbmbasic scripts but can anyone tell me how to run code in direct mode?
All I get is syntax errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m able to run cbmbasic scripts but can anyone tell me how to run code in direct mode?<br />
All I get is syntax errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dholm.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tumblelog: 090112</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-99131</link>
		<dc:creator>dholm.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tumblelog: 090112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-99131</guid>
		<description>[...] Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source, Michael Steil over at pagetable has statically recompiled and modified Commodore&#8217;s original BASIC so that it can be used as a scripting language in UNIX and Windows. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now Open Source, Michael Steil over at pagetable has statically recompiled and modified Commodore&#8217;s original BASIC so that it can be used as a scripting language in UNIX and Windows. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un par de emuladores retro &#124; FACIL TUTORIALES</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98831</link>
		<dc:creator>Un par de emuladores retro &#124; FACIL TUTORIALES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98831</guid>
		<description>[...] emuladores retro  Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008  Ir a comentarios Dejar un comentario             Commodore BASIC para Mac OS X, Linux y Windows, una versión para ordenadores modernos de ese lenguaje que tantas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] emuladores retro  Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008  Ir a comentarios Dejar un comentario             Commodore BASIC para Mac OS X, Linux y Windows, una versión para ordenadores modernos de ese lenguaje que tantas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98634</link>
		<dc:creator>marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98634</guid>
		<description>Zuruck in die Zukunft mit c64! Eureka!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zuruck in die Zukunft mit c64! Eureka!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El basic del Commodore 64, en el PC</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98632</link>
		<dc:creator>El basic del Commodore 64, en el PC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98632</guid>
		<description>[...] P&#225;gina del proyecto, C&#243;digo fuente del [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P&aacute;gina del proyecto, C&oacute;digo fuente del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re-run Your First Program with Commodore BASIC [Friday Fun] &#124; Techno Portal</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98608</link>
		<dc:creator>Re-run Your First Program with Commodore BASIC [Friday Fun] &#124; Techno Portal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98608</guid>
		<description>[...] Sunset Boulevard. Free binary downloads are available for Windows and Mac, source code for Linux. Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sunset Boulevard. Free binary downloads are available for Windows and Mac, source code for Linux. Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now Open Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unix Basic</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98506</link>
		<dc:creator>Unix Basic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98506</guid>
		<description>Basic unix Scripts

http://java-j2ee-interview-questions2.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-to-write-unix-scripts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basic unix Scripts</p>
<p><a href="http://java-j2ee-interview-questions2.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-to-write-unix-scripts.html" rel="nofollow">http://java-j2ee-interview-questions2.blogspot.com/2008/11/how-to-write-unix-scripts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamakaze.org &#187; Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98483</link>
		<dc:creator>kamakaze.org &#187; Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98483</guid>
		<description>[...] Wow does this bring back memories. Find info about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wow does this bring back memories. Find info about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language Open Source &#124; Gioorgi.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98460</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language Open Source &#124; Gioorgi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98460</guid>
		<description>[...] pagetable.com » Blog Archive » Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now .... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pagetable.com » Blog Archive » Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Source Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language &#171; Wiz And Chips</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98390</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Source Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language &#171; Wiz And Chips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98390</guid>
		<description>[...] as a Scripting&#160;Language  17 11 2008   On October 28th Michael Steil announced on his blog Pagetable the release of Commodore BASIC as a scripting language for Linux, Windows and Mac (OS X 10.4/10.5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a Scripting&nbsp;Language  17 11 2008   On October 28th Michael Steil announced on his blog Pagetable the release of Commodore BASIC as a scripting language for Linux, Windows and Mac (OS X 10.4/10.5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KindlyRat</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98356</link>
		<dc:creator>KindlyRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98356</guid>
		<description>I must report that GW-BASIC is still being used, runs on any Windows platform and is available free at:
http://www.geocities.com/KindlyRat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must report that GW-BASIC is still being used, runs on any Windows platform and is available free at:<br />
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/KindlyRat" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocities.com/KindlyRat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El blog de Miguel » Commodore BASIC como lenguaje de script para Linux, Mac y Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98342</link>
		<dc:creator>El blog de Miguel » Commodore BASIC como lenguaje de script para Linux, Mac y Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98342</guid>
		<description>[...] Pagetable ha publicado un programa que trae de vuelta el mitico lenguaje BASIC de ordenadores de Commodore como es el Commodore 64, a nuestro sistema actual. El programa es multiplataforma, de código abierto y está diponible para Linux, MacOS X y Windows. Y lo mas importante, te permite usarlo como un lenguaje de scripting en tu sistema. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pagetable ha publicado un programa que trae de vuelta el mitico lenguaje BASIC de ordenadores de Commodore como es el Commodore 64, a nuestro sistema actual. El programa es multiplataforma, de código abierto y está diponible para Linux, MacOS X y Windows. Y lo mas importante, te permite usarlo como un lenguaje de scripting en tu sistema. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oisín</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98336</link>
		<dc:creator>Oisín</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98336</guid>
		<description>Where did you get the idea to use CBM basic for scripting on a modern OS? The first computer I ever had was a C64, when I was about 8 years old in 1990. I started learning to program, but never really got the knack for it until I discovered GFA Basic for my next computer, an Atari ST, a couple of years later.
I quickly came to feel that C64 basic sucked horribly, was inexpressive, hard-to-use and unfriendly - at least compared to GFA (not having line numbers was another nice thing :)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you get the idea to use CBM basic for scripting on a modern OS? The first computer I ever had was a C64, when I was about 8 years old in 1990. I started learning to program, but never really got the knack for it until I discovered GFA Basic for my next computer, an Atari ST, a couple of years later.<br />
I quickly came to feel that C64 basic sucked horribly, was inexpressive, hard-to-use and unfriendly &#8211; at least compared to GFA (not having line numbers was another nice thing :)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kodlamanın nostaljisi: Commodore Basic &#187; opereysin.com - Seviyeli, kaliteli&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98332</link>
		<dc:creator>Kodlamanın nostaljisi: Commodore Basic &#187; opereysin.com - Seviyeli, kaliteli&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98332</guid>
		<description>[...] meraklı bir programcı, bu programlama dilini günümüz bilgisayarlarında kullanılabilir hale getirmiş. Bu &#8220;yaşlı&#8221; dil ne işimize yarar demeyin. Nostalji yapmak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meraklı bir programcı, bu programlama dilini günümüz bilgisayarlarında kullanılabilir hale getirmiş. Bu &#8220;yaşlı&#8221; dil ne işimize yarar demeyin. Nostalji yapmak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zombie Technologies You Thought Were Dead &#124; Gadget Access</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98329</link>
		<dc:creator>Zombie Technologies You Thought Were Dead &#124; Gadget Access</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98329</guid>
		<description>[...] old interpreters are still with us. We have niche QBasic hobby sites still kicking, we have an open-source Commodore BASIC emulator that just got released for Windows and Linux, and Microsoft itself has returned to its roots with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] old interpreters are still with us. We have niche QBasic hobby sites still kicking, we have an open-source Commodore BASIC emulator that just got released for Windows and Linux, and Microsoft itself has returned to its roots with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source &#124; www.gadgetguy.de - The GadgetGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98328</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source &#124; www.gadgetguy.de - The GadgetGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98328</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#039;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!This is quite cool: &#8220;Today, we are releasing Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language - it works on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!This is quite cool: &#8220;Today, we are releasing Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language &#8211; it works on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Brandt &#187; Weekly Links 20081109</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98326</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Brandt &#187; Weekly Links 20081109</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98326</guid>
		<description>[...] are lots of scripting languages for Unix/Linux and Windows, but this one just kinda blew me away, and brought back some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are lots of scripting languages for Unix/Linux and Windows, but this one just kinda blew me away, and brought back some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Houdek</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98301</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Houdek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98301</guid>
		<description>It also lack of a user manual for this type interpreter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also lack of a user manual for this type interpreter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Houdek</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98300</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Houdek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98300</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a great idea!, but do i have to do a lot of &quot;poke&quot; and &quot;peek&quot; to get high resolution graphics and sound?:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a great idea!, but do i have to do a lot of &#8220;poke&#8221; and &#8220;peek&#8221; to get high resolution graphics and sound?:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Off Topic &#171; Open World</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=2#comment-98291</link>
		<dc:creator>Off Topic &#171; Open World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98291</guid>
		<description>[...] Trovate tutto su Pagetable.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Trovate tutto su Pagetable.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KindlyRat</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98286</link>
		<dc:creator>KindlyRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98286</guid>
		<description>my standard test of a BASIC is to run a for/next loop and then print the counter number. on this Basic I get a strange printed thingy after each print. try it

10 FOR N = 1 TO 10
20 PRINT N
30 NEXT N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my standard test of a BASIC is to run a for/next loop and then print the counter number. on this Basic I get a strange printed thingy after each print. try it</p>
<p>10 FOR N = 1 TO 10<br />
20 PRINT N<br />
30 NEXT N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hukares</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98282</link>
		<dc:creator>hukares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98282</guid>
		<description>i hope further improvements can be done on this BASIC. like having to support GUI. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope further improvements can be done on this BASIC. like having to support GUI. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back to the Basic(s)</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98281</link>
		<dc:creator>Back to the Basic(s)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98281</guid>
		<description>[...] di far interagire un bel programmino in Basic con il vostro sistema operativo. Trovate tutto su Pagetable.com.     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] di far interagire un bel programmino in Basic con il vostro sistema operativo. Trovate tutto su Pagetable.com.     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chipping the web: November 5th -- Chip&#8217;s Quips</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98280</link>
		<dc:creator>Chipping the web: November 5th -- Chip&#8217;s Quips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98280</guid>
		<description>[...] pagetable.com: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open SourceFor those with way too much time on their hands.Tags: programming languages opensource basic c64 commodore64 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pagetable.com: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now Open SourceFor those with way too much time on their hands.Tags: programming languages opensource basic c64 commodore64 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McColley.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Re-run Your First Program with Commodore BASIC [Friday Fun]</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98279</link>
		<dc:creator>McColley.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Re-run Your First Program with Commodore BASIC [Friday Fun]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98279</guid>
		<description>[...] Sunset Boulevard. Free binary downloads are available for Windows and Mac, source code for Linux. Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sunset Boulevard. Free binary downloads are available for Windows and Mac, source code for Linux. Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now Open Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98275</guid>
		<description>Amazing stuff. I started learning programming on C-64, so this is incredibly emotional thing to see implemented. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing stuff. I started learning programming on C-64, so this is incredibly emotional thing to see implemented. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop - November 5, 2008 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98273</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop - November 5, 2008 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98273</guid>
		<description>[...] Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - Now Open Source (Michael Steil) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; Now Open Source (Michael Steil) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swiz</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98271</link>
		<dc:creator>Swiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98271</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to quit infinite loops and go back to the interpreter? I&#039;m afraid my PC&#039;s keyboard lacks RUN/STOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to quit infinite loops and go back to the interpreter? I&#8217;m afraid my PC&#8217;s keyboard lacks RUN/STOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Tigreat</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98268</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Tigreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98268</guid>
		<description>Michael: your &quot;recompiler&quot; and your words about your work related to Amiga programs really impresses me! I would like to know more about it. Precisely I would like to know in what extend it could be ported to AROS which could provide almost all native functions as it reimplements original libraries from scratch (and that means it&#039;s not limited to dos and exec). And what about recompiling third-party #?.library #?.device and so on? What do you think? Am I only dreaming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: your &#8220;recompiler&#8221; and your words about your work related to Amiga programs really impresses me! I would like to know more about it. Precisely I would like to know in what extend it could be ported to AROS which could provide almost all native functions as it reimplements original libraries from scratch (and that means it&#8217;s not limited to dos and exec). And what about recompiling third-party #?.library #?.device and so on? What do you think? Am I only dreaming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pagetable.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple I BASIC as a Mac OS X Scripting Language</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98267</link>
		<dc:creator>pagetable.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Apple I BASIC as a Mac OS X Scripting Language</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98267</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows - now Open Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Commodore BASIC as a Scripting Language for UNIX and Windows &#8211; now Open Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne McDougall</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98263</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne McDougall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98263</guid>
		<description>I am very impressed but miss TI and TI$.

It shouldn&#039;t be too hard to implement, and would mean timing loops using TI would work correctly.

I love Jiffies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very impressed but miss TI and TI$.</p>
<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to implement, and would mean timing loops using TI would work correctly.</p>
<p>I love Jiffies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98262</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98262</guid>
		<description>WOW, very nice. Looking forward to this evolving and doing some &quot;machine language&quot;


Load the Accumulator!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, very nice. Looking forward to this evolving and doing some &#8220;machine language&#8221;</p>
<p>Load the Accumulator!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonz</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98256</guid>
		<description>Now if you can figure out how to read my old 5.25&quot; floppies that failed to read because my floppy reader was &quot;out of alignment&quot; you&#039;d be my hero!\

Long live C-64!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if you can figure out how to read my old 5.25&#8243; floppies that failed to read because my floppy reader was &#8220;out of alignment&#8221; you&#8217;d be my hero!\</p>
<p>Long live C-64!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Steil</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98253</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Steil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98253</guid>
		<description>@mafutha: Please read earlier posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mafutha: Please read earlier posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mafutha</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98252</link>
		<dc:creator>mafutha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98252</guid>
		<description>Is there a possibility that we could see a version of amiga basic also? But This is wonderful; just to run old C-64 programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a possibility that we could see a version of amiga basic also? But This is wonderful; just to run old C-64 programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Steil</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98249</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Steil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98249</guid>
		<description>@Bob: You could change CHRIN() in runtime.c to make all input uppercase, but then you would lose the possibility to use lowercase in strings. Another idea would be to swap upper case and lower case on both CHRIN() and CHROUT() - so keywords would have to be lower case, but BASIC would preserve the case.

Commodore BASIC had hooks for external extensions in the tokenizer, detokenizer and interpreter; I&#039;m thinking about providing these hooks to runtime.c. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob: You could change CHRIN() in runtime.c to make all input uppercase, but then you would lose the possibility to use lowercase in strings. Another idea would be to swap upper case and lower case on both CHRIN() and CHROUT() &#8211; so keywords would have to be lower case, but BASIC would preserve the case.</p>
<p>Commodore BASIC had hooks for external extensions in the tokenizer, detokenizer and interpreter; I&#8217;m thinking about providing these hooks to runtime.c. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumpendebat</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98248</link>
		<dc:creator>dumpendebat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98248</guid>
		<description>This is just incredibly cool.  Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just incredibly cool.  Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48&#038;cpage=1#comment-98247</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pagetable.com/?p=48#comment-98247</guid>
		<description>It seems like this is CASE SENSITIVE and all BASIC commands have to be in CAPS!  Is there an easy way to change this?

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like this is CASE SENSITIVE and all BASIC commands have to be in CAPS!  Is there an easy way to change this?</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
